Mick Lescure vs Joel Cannell Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L L W W L L
Form
L W L L L W W L L LHead-2-Head: Lescure 1 - 0 Cannell
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lescure winning 2 and Cannell winning 0. The last match between Lescure and Cannell was at the Spain F15 (Martos), 12-06-2018, First, Hard with Mick Lescure getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mick Lescure | 1 |
| Joel Cannell | 0 |
Spain F15 (Martos)(12-06-2018)
6
1
6
1
| Lescure | Stats | Cannell |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 487 | Highest Rank | 822 |
| 31 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 54% (216-183) | Career Total W/L | 57% (98-75) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shnaider VS Volynets PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Korda VS Cina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mick Lescure Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-6 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Tibo Colson
Player
Mick Lescure
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mick Lescure
Player
Julien De Cuyper
49%
(
18 of
37)
1st Serve %
44%
(
17 of
39)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mick Lescure
Player
Loann Massard
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julien Eon
Player
Mick Lescure
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
9
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 5-7 16-14 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Lopez Montagud
Player
Mick Lescure
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
49%
(
46 of
93)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
9
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Mick Lescure
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
44%
(
25 of
57)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mick Lescure
Player
Pierre Broquin
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxence Beauge
Player
Mick Lescure
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
8
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mick Lescure
Player
Batiste Klein
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
43%
(
19 of
44)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
3 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Joel Cannell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aziz Ouakaa
Player
Joel Cannell
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Joel Cannell
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Vilardo
Player
Joel Cannell
47%
(
34 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 4-6 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Joel Cannell
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samuel Shropshire
Player
Joel Cannell
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Bothwell
Player
Joel Cannell
54%
(
69 of
128)
1st Serve %
58%
(
68 of
117)
3
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
6
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
44%
(
26 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
45%
(
58 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
52 of
117)
122
Total Points Won
123
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joel Cannell
Player
Paul Cayre
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Redlicki
Player
Joel Cannell
64%
(
68 of
106)
1st Serve %
49%
(
54 of
110)
13
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
13
79%
(
54 of
68)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
30%
(
32 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
35 of
110)
109
Total Points Won
107
|
2-6 7-6(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (216/183) | Win/Loss | 57% (98/75) |
| 54% (489/414) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (222/168) |
| 52% (4319/3996) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (1943/1654) |
| 59% (112/78) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (55/38) |
| 51% (32/31) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (31/27) |
| 49% (72/74) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (12/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 893 | Aces Total | 232 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 871 | Total Double Faults | 226 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 555.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 390.72 |
| 52% (7503/14479) | 1st Serve % | 60% (2887/4848) |
| 71% (5293/7503) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (1964/2887) |
| 49% (3385/6977) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (925/1960) |
| 46% (693/1522) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (194/474) |
| 41% (5801/14033) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1924/4907) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (16/16) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 54% (200/167) | Futures W/L | 57% (98/73) |
| 54% (216/397) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (95/170) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 43% (40/92) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (20/37) |
| 47% (51/108) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (17/45) |
| 87% (213/186) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (101/90) |
| 13% (213/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (101/11) |
| 16% (185/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (72/8) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
